Bug 458 – Doesn't build with QtMobility 1.1.0~beta2

PySide Bugzilla Closed for New Bugs

PySide is now a Qt Add-on and uses the Qt Project's JIRA Bug Tracker instead of this Bugzilla instance. This Bugzilla is left for reference purposes.

Bug 458 - Doesn't build with QtMobility 1.1.0~beta2

Summary:

Doesn't build with QtMobility 1.1.0~beta2

Status:	CLOSED INVALID

Product:	PySide Mobility
Classification:	Unclassified
Component:	Location
Version:	0.1.0
Platform:	All All

Importance:	P3 major
Assigned To:	Lauro Moura

URL:

Depends on:
Blocks:
	Show dependency tree / graph

Reported:	2010-11-04 06:24 EET by Didier Raboud
Modified:	2011-01-21 15:44 EET (History)
CC List:	8 users (show)

See Also:

Attachments
Build log for pyisde-mobility 0.2.0 on Debian with qtmobility 1.1.0~beta2 (173.85 KB, application/octet-stream) 2010-11-04 06:24 EET, Didier Raboud	Details
Add an attachment (proposed patch, testcase, etc.)

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.

Description Didier Raboud 2010-11-04 06:24:55 EET

Created attachment 138 [details]
Build log for pyisde-mobility 0.2.0 on Debian with qtmobility 1.1.0~beta2

Hi, 

while trying to build PySide-QtMobility with Debian's QtMobility (1.1.0~beta2),
it just failed. Build log is attached.

Cheers,

OdyX

Comment 1 Lauro Moura 2010-11-05 18:26:48 EET

Didier, how could I reproduce these errors? I tried a sid debootstrap +
experimental in sources.list but it keeps installing the wrong version (Qt
4.6).

Comment 2 Didier Raboud 2010-11-07 08:11:04 EET

Hi Lauro, 

you can download my packaging there:
http://git.debian.org/?p=users/odyx-guest/pyside-mobility.git;a=summary

You can force the install of Qt and Qt-mobility by installing the
qtmobility-dev package (it will pull the Qt4.7 version).

Comment 3 Lauro Moura 2010-11-09 17:50:06 EET

Didier, thanks for the info.

There were some API breaks moving beta2 to the final QtMobility 1.1.0 release
and the 0.2.0 bindings tarball is targeted at the final 1.1.0 release, already
available in upstream. I think it better to wait until it's packaged.

Any thoughts?

Comment 4 Lauro Moura 2010-11-10 14:45:20 EET

Marking as invalid.

Comment 5 renato filho 2011-01-21 15:44:37 EET

release beta4