PySide Bugzilla Closed for New Bugs

PySide is now a Qt Add-on and uses the Qt Project's JIRA Bug Tracker instead of this Bugzilla instance. This Bugzilla is left for reference purposes.

Bug 255 - Test qtscripttools_debugger segfaults on ia64
: Test qtscripttools_debugger segfaults on ia64
Status: CLOSED FIXED
Product: PySide
Classification: Unclassified
Component: QtScriptTools
: 0.4.2
: Other Linux
: P5 normal
Assigned To: renato filho
: https://buildd.debian.org/fetch.cgi?p...
:
:
  Show dependency treegraph
 
Reported: 2010-06-25 05:03 EEST by Didier Raboud
Modified: 2011-01-21 15:44 EET (History)
8 users (show)

See Also:


Attachments

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description Didier Raboud 2010-06-25 05:03:49 EEST
Hi, 

with shiboken now built on ia64, here's a test failure : ( ;-> )

Test qtscripttools_debugger segfaults with following error: 

182/183 Test #182: qtscripttools_debugger .....................***Failed   
0.32 sec
advance.qs: command definition lacks a name
backtrace.qs: command definition lacks a name
break.qs:0: 1.4450535421558688e-154
clear.qs:0: 1.4450535421557946e-154
complete.qs: command definition lacks a name
condition.qs: command definition lacks a name
continue.qs:0: 1.4450535421558264e-154
delete.qs: command definition lacks a name
disable.qs: command definition lacks a name
down.qs: command definition lacks a name
enable.qs: command definition lacks a name
eval.qs: command definition lacks a name
finish.qs: command definition lacks a name
frame.qs: command definition lacks a name
help.qs: command definition lacks a name
ignore.qs: command definition lacks a name
info.qs:0: 1.4450535421558794e-154
interrupt.qs: command definition lacks a name
list.qs:0: 1.4450535421557734e-154
next.qs:0: 1.4450535421558688e-154
print.qs: command definition lacks a name
return.qs: command definition lacks a name
step.qs: command definition lacks a name
tbreak.qs: command definition lacks a name
up.qs: command definition lacks a name
Segmentation fault


Cheers, 

OdyX
Comment 1 Matti Airas 2010-11-22 15:21:10 EET
I thought Itanic already went the way of the dodo. :-) Is the bug still valid?
In any case, retaining P5 priority because ia-64 isn't exactly priority for us.
:-p
Comment 3 Hugo Parente Lima 2010-12-29 10:28:22 EET
The bug also exist on MacOSX.
Comment 4 Lauro Moura 2010-12-29 18:35:51 EET
Didier, could you check this updated version of the test?

http://qt.gitorious.org/pyside/pyside/commit/bc9ddff514dfe9b4f1c133a59ef63fe72e7c8be5
Comment 5 Hugo Parente Lima 2011-01-03 15:11:37 EET
*** Bug 579 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 6 Hugo Parente Lima 2011-01-11 18:24:44 EET
Closing bug as bug 579 were fixed and it's probably a duplicated bug.

Please reopen the bug If it still exists on IA64.
Comment 7 renato filho 2011-01-21 15:44:36 EET
release beta4