Bug 587 – Test: protected (Failed)

PySide Bugzilla Closed for New Bugs

PySide is now a Qt Add-on and uses the Qt Project's JIRA Bug Tracker instead of this Bugzilla instance. This Bugzilla is left for reference purposes.

Bug 587 - Test: protected (Failed)

Summary:

Test: protected (Failed)

Status:	CLOSED FIXED

Product:	PySide
Classification:	Unclassified
Component:	Shiboken
Version:	HEAD
Platform:	All All

Importance:	P1 normal
Assigned To:	Marcelo Lira

URL:

Depends on:
Blocks:
	Show dependency tree / graph

Reported:	2011-01-05 12:14 EET by renato filho
Modified:	2011-01-06 16:19 EET (History)
CC List:	8 users (show)

See Also:

Attachments
Add an attachment (proposed patch, testcase, etc.)

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.

Description renato filho 2011-01-05 12:14:23 EET

Shiboken test fail on debian i386

Test output.

64: Test command: /usr/bin/python2.6
/tmp/work/debian_i386/Shiboken/tests/samplebinding/protected_test.py
64: Test timeout computed to be: 60
64: ...........FE.......
64: ======================================================================
64: ERROR: Calls a reimplemented virtual protected method from parent class.
64: ----------------------------------------------------------------------
64: Traceback (most recent call last):
64:   File
"/tmp/work/debian_i386/Shiboken/tests/samplebinding/protected_test.py", line
148, in tearDown
64:     self.assertEqual(cacheSize(), 0)
64: AssertionError: 1 != 0
64: 
64: ======================================================================
64: FAIL: Calls a reimplemented virtual protected method from parent class.
64: ----------------------------------------------------------------------
64: Traceback (most recent call last):
64:   File
"/tmp/work/debian_i386/Shiboken/tests/samplebinding/protected_test.py", line
161, in testReimplementedProtectedCall
64:     self.assert_(p.protectedName_called)
64: AssertionError
64: 
64: ----------------------------------------------------------------------
64: Ran 19 tests in 0.001s
64: 
64: FAILED (failures=1, errors=1)
64/96 Test #64: protected
....................................................***Failed    0.02 sec

Comment 1 Matti Airas 2011-01-05 12:27:33 EET

Assuming this is a regression, P1.

Again, since this must be caused by some very recent bugfix, I'd strongly
prefer finding and reopening the offending bug instead of filing new ones for
every failing test.

Comment 2 renato filho 2011-01-05 18:51:45 EET

fixed on apiextractor commit:

commit 56cca6a7c27808d8a51f689b5b72fd62c7afe280
Author: Renato Araujo Oliveira Filho <renato.filho@openbossa.org>
Date:   Wed Jan 5 17:07:59 2011 -0300

Comment 3 renato filho 2011-01-06 16:19:39 EET

released on beta3